Skip to content
Cover of Crosstown Traffic: Jimi Hendrix and Post-War Pop by Charles Shaar Murray
Cover image via Open Library · ISBN 9780857867742
The Reading Room · Book 032

Crosstown Traffic: Jimi Hendrix and Post-War Pop

Charles Shaar Murray

A Hendrix book interested less in the itinerary than in the consequences

First published1989
PublisherEdition-specific; verify retailer listing
Selected edition2012 Canongate print edition · ISBN 9780857867742
Jimi Hendrix / Rock Criticism

A Hendrix book interested less in the itinerary than in the consequences

If Charles R. Cross asks who Jimi Hendrix was, Charles Shaar Murray is more interested in what Hendrix meant. Crosstown Traffic: Jimi Hendrix and Post-War Pop contains biographical material, but it does not organise itself primarily around childhood, tours, records and death. Murray uses Hendrix as a cultural crossroads where electric blues, R&B, soul, jazz, rock, technology, Black identity, white rock audiences and the avant-garde meet. First published in 1989, the book won the Ralph J. Gleason Music Book Award; Faber revised it in 2001, and Canongate reissued it in 2012 with an updated introduction. That longevity is telling. A conventional biography can age as new documents emerge, while a strong work of criticism remains alive because its arguments continue to provoke new ways of hearing the music. For readers who already know the broad Hendrix life story, this may be the more transformative book.

Why "rock guitarist" is too small a category

Calling Hendrix a rock guitarist is accurate but drastically incomplete. His musical vocabulary drew from electric blues, the showmanship and rhythmic discipline of R&B, soul, jazz, contemporary studio practice and the new possibilities created by high-volume amplification. Murray takes that hybridity seriously and makes boundary crossing the central organising principle: Black and white markets, America and Britain, tradition and futurism, virtuosity and ensemble playing, blues inheritance and electronic experimentation all intersect in Hendrix's work. This is why a simple lineage from one guitar hero to the next cannot explain him. Hendrix did not merely play familiar blues-rock language with greater technical force; he altered the cultural and sonic assumptions around what an electric guitarist could represent. The instrument became a meeting place for traditions that the music industry and critical culture often preferred to keep in separate categories.

Blues as a living grammar rather than a museum exhibit

Murray's discussion of the blues is particularly valuable because he refuses the idea that respect for tradition requires stylistic conservatism. Hendrix could play within recognisable blues forms while surrounding them with Feedback, science-fiction imagery, extreme amplification and studio manipulation. The tradition remains audible without being preserved under glass. That distinction helps explain why Hendrix could sound radically modern without severing himself from Black musical history. The blues functioned as part of his grammar, not as a heritage costume worn when a song needed authenticity. For RetroForge, this offers a better model for writing about influence generally. Musical traditions survive precisely because artists transform them, and the presence of new technology does not automatically cancel continuity with older forms. Murray's Hendrix is revolutionary partly because he understood how much could be changed without pretending the past had disappeared.

A Black artist inside a rock canon increasingly imagined as white

One of the book's most durable contributions is its treatment of race. Rock music was profoundly indebted to Black American forms, yet by the late 1960s the rock audience and critical establishment increasingly treated "rock" as culturally distinct from contemporary soul and R&B. Hendrix had moved through Black touring circuits as a sideman before becoming the ultimate guitar revolutionary for a largely white rock audience after his British breakthrough. Murray examines how that shift affected the way Hendrix was heard, marketed and mythologised. The issue cannot be reduced to whether individual listeners were prejudiced; it concerns the cultural categories through which markets assign identity to music. A fuzz pedal can be described technically, but technology alone cannot explain why the same sound carries different meanings when produced by a Black American performer inside a genre busy obscuring its own Black foundations.

Jazz, improvisation and futures that never became genres

Murray also resists the simple family tree that runs from blues to rock and stops there. Hendrix admired jazz musicians, and his rhythmic freedom, improvisational instincts and increasingly open conception of form suggested possibilities beyond conventional rock-song architecture. That does not mean he was secretly a jazz musician waiting to abandon rock, and the book does not need that claim to make the connection meaningful. The point is that rigid categories become increasingly unhelpful around an artist whose music could be claimed convincingly by later hard rock, funk, fusion and experimental traditions. Because Hendrix died young, listeners inevitably speculate about directions he might have taken, but Murray's strongest argument does not depend on predicting an unwritten future. The surviving work already contains enough permeability to explain why so many later musicians from different scenes heard permission in it.

Technology only becomes interesting when somebody turns it into language

Hendrix's use of feedback, amplifier volume, wah-wah, fuzz and studio effects is central to guitar history, but Murray does not treat equipment as a shopping list of innovations. Technology becomes expressive because Hendrix integrates it with touch, rhythm, composition and physical stage presence. The guitar can whisper, explode, imitate machinery, smear into noise or behave almost orchestrally, while the body producing those sounds becomes part of how audiences interpret them. Hendrix had already learned visual stagecraft in R&B settings where performance mattered, then pushed those conventions into psychedelic rock until spectacle and sonic experiment became difficult to separate. This perspective is especially valuable for RetroForge's instrument pages. Gear matters, but the historical question is never only which device was used. The more interesting question is what an artist taught audiences to hear and see once the device entered a musical language.

Post-war pop is the real subject hiding in the subtitle

Murray's horizon extends far beyond 1966 to 1970. Hendrix becomes a lens through which to examine the cultural forms that produced him and the influences that travelled outward after his death. Hard rock absorbed power and sonic extremity; funk could hear rhythmic and timbral possibilities; jazz-rock responded to improvisational openness; later guitarists treated effects as part of composition; experimental rock inherited permission to use noise as a meaningful element rather than an error to be eliminated. None of these developments can be assigned to Hendrix alone, and Murray's argument is more interesting when influence is understood as participation in a much larger post-war musical conversation. The book therefore ages differently from a celebrity biography. New documents may alter details of a life, but the question of how Hendrix reorganised the relationship among Black music, rock, technology and popular culture remains open to debate.

Why the 2012 edition is the practical reading choice

The original 1989 publication has historical value in its own right, particularly because it captures Murray's argument less than two decades after Hendrix's death. Faber issued a revised and expanded edition in 2001, and Canongate's 2012 reissue added an updated introduction, allowing Murray to revisit Hendrix after another decade of archival activity and cultural influence. Google Books metadata lists the Canongate edition at roughly 336 pages, while the 2001 Faber version appears around 326 pages depending on format. For an ordinary reader, the 2012 edition is therefore the natural target when available, not because a later date automatically makes every argument superior but because it presents the mature text with contemporary framing. Older Faber copies remain useful and collectible, but retailer metadata should identify them rather than treating every edition as one interchangeable object.

What it does especially well

Ideas are the book's great strength. Murray writes criticism rather than merely arranging chronology, and the result can change how a reader hears familiar Hendrix recordings. His treatment of race prevents guitar history from becoming culturally weightless, while his interest in blues, jazz and R&B places Hendrix inside traditions that the standard white-rock canon has often separated from him. The electric guitar itself emerges as a cultural object rather than only a technical machine, carrying ideas about race, masculinity, technology, spectacle and modernity alongside pitch and distortion. The book's durability is another recommendation. A study that won recognition on first publication in 1989 and remained worth revising and reissuing decades later has clearly generated more than temporary commentary.

Limitations

Readers needing a complete detailed biography should not use Crosstown Traffic alone. Murray assumes a degree of familiarity with Hendrix and is more interested in interpretation than in documenting every tour, relationship or business dispute. Critical writing also invites disagreement in a way factual reference works do not. Some readers will reject parts of Murray's argument about genre, race or influence, and that is not evidence that the book has failed. Its purpose is to open routes through Hendrix rather than close the case. The correct companion is therefore a strong biography such as Room Full of Mirrors, which supplies the chronological architecture Murray is freer to move across and around.

Who should read it?

This is the Hendrix book for readers interested in Black music history, guitar culture, blues, jazz, funk and the politics of genre as much as in the details of one famous life. A useful pairing is simple: read Room Full of Mirrors for the broad human chronology, then Crosstown Traffic for the implications. David Henderson's 'Scuse Me While I Kiss the Sky adds another valuable biographical tradition, especially around Black cultural context and firsthand voices. For RetroForge, Murray's book should also surface outside the Hendrix shelf because its argument belongs naturally beside electric-guitar history, psychedelic rock and wider post-war popular culture.

Buying note

Prefer the 2012 Canongate reissue with updated introduction when available for ordinary reading; identify older Faber editions clearly.

Keep exploring

Continue through the RetroForge knowledge graph

Curated paths into the people, records, events and ideas that give this subject its wider musical context.